Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Case report
Austral J. Vet. Sci.
Vol 56, 99-103 (2024)

Cranial osteomyelitis associated with Pasteurella canis in broiler chickens

1 Núcleo de Investigaciones Aplicadas en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas, NIAVA; Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Agronomía, Universidad de las Américas, Campus Maipú, Santiago, Chile
2 Laboratory of Avian Pathology, Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile.
Keywords: poultry infection zoonotic pathogen dogs Pasteurella canis

Submitted: 2024-01-15

Accepted: 2024-04-23

Published: 2024-06-12

*Corresponding author:
lecadiz13@gmail.com

How to Cite

Cádiz, L., Navarrete, F. ., Torres, P. ., & Hidalgo, H. (2024). Cranial osteomyelitis associated with Pasteurella canis in broiler chickens . Austral Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 56(2), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.4206/ajvs.562.04

Abstract

Species of the Pasteurella genus are part of the oropharyngeal microbiota of many animal species. In poultry, Pasteurella multocida causes fowl cholera, the chronic manifestation of which can include neurological symptoms. Pasteurella canis causes osteomyelitis and other infections in humans. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of cranial osteomyelitis associated with Pasteurella canis in broiler chickens in Chile.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Case report

Cranial osteomyelitis, otitis, swollen head syndrome, and meningoencephalitis in poultry are associated with various infectious agents, including Avibacterium paragallinarum (Crispo et al., 2018), Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (Banani et al., 2015; Al-Hasan et al., 2021), and particularly Pasteurella multocida (Boulianne et al., 2020). Species of the Pasteurella genus are part of the normal oropharyngeal microbiota of many animal species and cause multiple infectious diseases in a wide range of organisms, including humans and poultry (Wilson & Ho, 2013). Pasteurella multocida and P.canisare the main Pasteurella genus speciesassociated with human diseases following septic bite wounds and inflammation at the injury site (Gautier et al., 2005). Pasteurella spp., which belongs to the Pasteurellaceae family, are small, non-motile, facultative anaerobic, gram-negative coccobacilli measuring 1-2 μm in length (Boulianne et al., 2020). Pasteurella multocida is the causative agent of fowl cholera, a contagious disease affecting domestic and wild birds, and mortality usually ranges from 0% to 20% in naturally infected chickens (Boulianne et al., 2020). The main clinical signs of acute presentation are fever, anorexia, ruffled feathers, mucoid discharge from the mouth, diarrhea, and an increased respiratory rate. Chronic presentation can cause torticollis and opisthotonos due to meningeal infection (Boulianne et al., 2020). Pasteurella canis is part of the normal microbiota of healthy companion animals, particularly dogs. On several occasions, P. canis infections have been reported in humans and are associated with osteomyelitis and cutaneous abscess in the right digit (Hara et al., 2002), soft tissue infection (Kim et al., 2016), breast implant infection (Hannouille et al., 2019), abdominalinfection(Mensah-Glanowska et al., 2020), septic arthritis of the femorotibial joint (Nascimento et al., 2021), and, recently, endophthalmitis (Bathula et al., 2023). Pasteurella canis has also been associated with endocarditis in dogs (Kern et al., 2019) and pneumonia in black-tailed marmosets (Da Silva et al., 2020).

To our knowledge, this is the first report of cranial osteomyelitis associated with P. canis infection in broiler chickens in Chile, and it is supported by pre- and post-mortem findings, bacterial culture, biochemical characteristics, and histopathologicalanalysis.

Between September 2022 and August 2023, the Avian Pathology Laboratory at Universidad de Chile received 35 broiler chickens aged 34-45-d-old for diagnostic evaluation following the sudden onset of neurological symptoms. The fowl came from a commercial broiler farm in the Libertador General Bernardo O’Higgins Region, where the condition affected 4% of the birds, showing a slight increase in mortality, which was quickly controlled through treatment with amoxicillin administered in drinking water at 20 mg/kg body weight daily at 12 h intervals for 5 days. All broiler chickens received live attenuated vaccines against infectious bursal disease (IBD) and avian infectious bronchitis (IB) at one day of age.

Prior to necropsy, the chickens presented severe disorientation (n = 31), torticollis (n = 29), opisthotonos (n = 29), and difficulty standing (n = 21) (Figure 1). They were euthanized by cervical dislocation, and the gross post-mortem examination revealed mild nasal discharge (n=32), caseous material, and fragility in the cranial bone (n = 29), mainly in the ventral area close to the ear (Figure 2). No other significant injuries were observed in the outer, middle, or inner ear; upper respiratory system; joints; or internal organs.

Figure 2. Macroscopic lesions in affected birds. Cranial osteomyelitis with the presence of caseous material (white arrows).

Samples of the brain, cranial bone, nasal discharge, and middle ear of the affected birds were obtained aseptically, plated on tryptone soy agar containing 5% blood and MacConkey agar, and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C for 24 h. Cranial bone (occipital) sections (n=5) were collected, decalcified with 3% nitric acid, fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for three days, embedded in paraffin wax, cut into 4 µm sections, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and examined under a light microscope.

Brain samples were aseptically collected and homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2) 10% containing 200 U/mL penicillin and 0.2 mg/mL streptomycin. Homogenates were vortexed for 10 s, subjected to three freeze-thaw cycles, and centrifuged at 3000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a sterile tube and preserved at −80 °C to rule out the presence of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and avian influenza virus (AIV) infection by viral isolation and hemagglutination assays (Alexander, 2000). Nasal discharge samples were collected toexcludethe presence of Mycoplasma synoviae and Mycoplasma gallisepticum by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) under previously reported conditions (Lauerman, 1998).

After 24h incubation on blood agar plates, cultures from the cranial bone (n=29), brain (n=20), and middleear (n=10) presented smooth, grayish-white, mucoid, non-hemolytic colonies compatible with Pasteurella spp. (Figure 3). No bacterial growth was observed on MacConkey agar plates. No colonies compatible with Pasteurella were observed in nasal discharge samples. Pure subcultures were obtained from single colonies on a blood agar plate for Gram staining, catalase and oxidase tests, and biochemical testing using the Vitek® 2 Compact identification system (BioMerieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.The latter identified the species as Pasteurella canis with an accuracy of 99 %. The main results of the biochemical testing that identified Pasteurella canis isolated in this study, distinguishing it from other species of the Pasteurella genus, such as Pasteurella multocida, Pasteurella stomatis, and Pasteurella dagmatis (Christensen & Bisgaard, 2024), are detailed in Table 1. All the isolates were gram-negative.

Figure 3. On 5% blood agar, after 24 h incubation, smooth, grayish-white colonies were observed.

Test Pasteurella canis Pasteurella multocida Pasteurella stomatis Pasteurella dagmatis
Catalase + + + +
Oxidase + + + +
Indole production + + + +
Urease - - - +
Ornithine decarboxylase + + - -
Lysine decarboxylase - - + +
Acid from:
D-mannitol - + - -
Dulcitol - V - -
D-Sorbitol - V - -
Maltose - - - +
D-arabinose - V - V
Table 1. Results of the main biochemical tests on the Pasteurella canis strains isolated in this study and other species of the Pasteurella genus

Histopathological examination of cranial bone samples revealed a chronic inflammatory response and dense infiltration of inflammatory cells, including heterophilsthat form granular eosinophilic aggregates surrounded by macrophages, along with extensive bone resorption and necrotic bone tissue. Several bacteria were observed in the center of the lesions. These microscopic alterations were consistent with granulomatous osteomyelitis (Figure 4). The NDV and AIV testing by viral isolation and hemagglutination assay were negative, as were PCR analyses for Mycoplasma synoviae and Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Given the macroscopic and microscopic lesions observed, characteristics of the isolated colonies, Gram staining, and biochemical testing of the isolates obtained from brain, cranial bone, and middle ear samples, we confirmed the diagnosis of cranial osteomyelitis associated with Pasteurella canis.Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disk diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of Pasteurella canis isolated from the cranial bone (Table 2).

Figure 4. Histological lesions of affected broiler chickens. Granulomatous osteomyelitis is observed with the presence of inflammatory cells. There is extensive bone resorption and necrotic bone tissue. Several bacteria are observed in the center of the lesion (black arrow). H&E. Bar = 100 μm.

Antimicrobial Inhibition halo (mm) Interpretation
Amoxycillin 31 Sensitive
Colistin 15 Sensitive
Enrofloxacin 31 Sensitive
Streptomycin 10 Resistant
Florfenicol 33 Sensitive
Fosfomycin 30 Sensitive
Fosfomycin + Tylosin 25 Sensitive
Lincomycin 0 Resistant
Lincomycin-Spectinomycin 20 Sensitive
Norfloxacin 29 Sensitive
Oxytetracycline 23 Sensitive
Sulfadoxine-Trimethoprim 28 Sensitive
Sulfisomidine 0 Resistant
Tiamulin 15 Intermediate
Tylosin 16 Intermediate
Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility test results for Pasteurella canis isolate from cranial bone.

Neurological symptoms such as severe disorientation, torticollis, opisthotonos, and difficulty standing could cause significant losses for the poultry industry owing to poor feed conversion ratios, higher mortality, and increased slaughterhouse condemnation of broilers. Like any infectious disease, it causes immunological stress that drives down food consumption, keeps affected birds from feeding properly, delays growth, and lowers the weight of chickens in slaughterhouses (Boulianne et al., 2020).

Pasteurella canis, formerly known as P. multocida biotype 6, or ‘dog type’ (Mutters et al., 1985), is part of the normal microbiota of the oral cavity of dogs and cats (Wilson & Ho, 2013). Two biotypes of P. canis have been described: biotype 1 is mainly observed in the oral cavities of dogs, whereas biotype 2 is isolated from calves. Biotype 1 is also normally isolated from bite wounds of carrier animals (Gautier et al., 2005). Dogs and cats found near farms are likely sources of infectious agents in poultry, such as Pasteurella canis.

Although middle and inner ear infections are uncommon in birds (Shivaprasadet al., 2006), pathogens can migrate from the nasal turbinate, oral cavity, or infraorbital sinus, and extend into the middle ear through the ear canal to colonize the inner ear.Another possibility is that Pasteurella canis spreads from the sinuses to the adjacent air-filled skull bones, with subsequent necrosis and the onset of neurological symptoms, producing secondary ear infections (Boulianneet al., 2020). This could explain the absence of any evident inflammation in the inner, middle, or outer ear despite the isolation of Pasteurella canis in the middle ear samples.Although the isolated Pasteurella canis strain is susceptible to 10 of the 15 antimicrobials tested, its presence in animals intended for human consumption could constitute a serious public health issue. Given its ability to cause infection without a bite or direct inoculation, it can potentially become a zoonotic foodborne pathogen (Hannouilleet al., 2019). Furthermore, the use of antimicrobials to control infection increases the risk of antimicrobial resistance owing to the selective pressure of antibiotics and their limited availability for poultry farming. All isolated Pasteurella canis strains were sensitive to amoxicillin, consistent with decreased mortality after treatment.

As pathogens can be transmitted directly or indirectly via different routes, the design and implementation of biosecurity measures must consider all possible pathogens and production chain entry routes. In poultry production, biosecurity measures focus primarily on preventing highly transmissible exotic diseases (e.g., avian influenza and Newcastle disease) and foodborne zoonotic diseases caused by bacteria that are part of the normal intestinal microbiota of birds (e.g., Salmonella and Campylobacter) (Souillardet al., 2024). However, biosecurity measures must also control pathogenic agents with uncommon entry routes, particularly those transmitted by biological vectors, such as dogs and cats living near or inside poultry farming facilities. These vectors include workers’ companion animals, wild cats, and guard dogs, which carry pathogens with great zoonotic potential that could emerge through poultry farming, such as Pasteurella canis.

Figure 1. Broiler chicken with severe disorientation, displaying symptoms of torticollis and opisthotonos, anddifficulty standing

References

  1. Alexander D. J. (2000). Newcastle disease and other avian paramyxoviruses. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 19(2), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.19.2.1231
  2. Al-Hasan, B. A., Alhatami, A. O., Abdulwahab, H. M., Bustani, G. S., & Wahab Alkuwaity, E. A. (2021). The first isolation and detection of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale from swollen head syndrome-infected broiler flocks in Iraq. Veterinary world, 14(9), 2346–2355. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.2346-2355
  3. Banani, M., Hablolvarid, M., Momayez, R., Nouri, A., Ghodsian, N., Ashtari, A., & Mirzaei, S. (2015). Isolation of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale from the brains of commercial broiler breeder chickens with meningitis and encephalitis. Archives of Razi Institute, 70(3), 203-209. https://doi.org/10.7508/ari.2015.03.009
  4. Bathula, S., Bhate, M., Joseph, J., Tyagi, M., & Bagga, B. (2023). Pediatric Pasteurella canis endophthalmitis. Journal of AAPOS: The official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 27(3), 172–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.03.005
  5. Boulianne, M., Blackall, P. J., Hofacre, C. L., Ruiz, J. A., Sandhu, T. S., Hafez, H. M., Chin, R. P., Register, K. B. & Jackwood, M. W. (2020). Pasteurellosis and Other Respiratory Bacterial Infections. In D. E. Swayne, M. Boulianne, C. M. Logue, L. R. McDougald, V. Nair, D. L. Suarez, S. Wit, T. Grimes, D. Johnson, M. Kromm, T. Y. Prajitno, I. Rubinoff & G. Zavala (Eds.), Diseases of Poultry. (14th ed., pp. 831-889). John Wiley & Sons, Inc https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119371199.ch19
  6. Christensen, H., & Bisgaard, M. (2024). Pasteurella. In Y-W Tang, M. Y. Hindiyeh, D. Liu, A. Sails, P. Spearman, J-R. Zhang (Eds), Molecular Medical Microbiology (3rd ed., pp. 1637-1656). Academic Press.
  7. Crispo, M., Sentíes-Cué, C. G., Cooper, G. L., Mountainspring, G., Corsiglia, C., Bickford, A. A., & Stoute, S. T. (2018). Otitis and meningoencephalitis associated with infectious coryza (Avibacterium paragallinarum) in commercial broiler chickens. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 30(5), 784–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638718792964
  8. Da Silva, M. I. V., Bento, H. J., Maruyama, F. H., Rosa, J. M. A., Mesquita, M. C. S. R., Pavelegini, L. A. D., Morgado, T. O., Colodel, E. M., Nakazato, L., & Dutra, V. (2020). Pasteurella canis infection in a non-human primate black-tailed marmoset (Mico melanurus) - A case report. Journal of Medical Primatology, 49(2), 107–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmp.12452
  9. Gautier, A. L., Dubois, D., Escande, F., Avril, J. L., Trieu-Cuot, P., & Gaillot, O. (2005). Rapid and accurate identification of human isolates of Pasteurella and related species by sequencing the sodA gene. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 43(5), 2307–2314. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.5.2307-2314.2005
  10. Hannouille, J., Belgrado, J. P., Vankerchove, S., & Vandermeeren, L. (2019). Breast implant infection with Pasteurella canis: First case report. JPRAS Open, 21, 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2019.07.006
  11. Hara, H., Ochiai, T., Morishima, T., Arashima, Y., Kumasaka, K., & Kawano, K. Y. (2002). Pasteurella canis osteomyelitis and cutaneous abscess after a domestic dog bite. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 46(5), S151–S152. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2002.106350
  12. Kern, Z. T., Swartley, O. M., Neupane, P., Balakrishnan, N., & Breitschwerdt, E. B. (2019). Pasteurella canis infective endocarditis in a dog. Veterinary Microbiology, 229, 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.12.001
  13. Kim, B., Pai, H., Lee, K. H., & Lee, Y. (2016). Identification of Pasteurella canis in a Soft Tissue Infection Caused by a Dog Bite: The First Report in Korea. Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 36(6), 617–619. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2016.36.6.617
  14. Lauerman, L.H. (1998). Mycoplasma PCR Assays. In L.H. Lauerman (Ed.), Nucleic Amplification Assays for Diagnosis of Animal Diseases (pp. 41–52). American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Auburn, AL, USA.
  15. Mensah-Glanowska, P., Fornagiel, S., Chrzan, R., Ulatowska-Białas, M., & Piątkowska-Jakubas, B. (2020). Of horses and zebras: a gastrointestinal infection with Pasteurella canis in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine, 130(4), 335–337. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.15142
  16. Mutters, R., Ihm, P., Pohl, S., Frederiksen, W., & Mannheim, W. (1985). Reclassification of the genus Pasteurella Trevisan 1887 on the basis of deoxyribonucleic acid homology, with proposals for the new species Pasteurella dagmatis, Pasteurella canis, Pasteurella stomatis, Pasteurella anatis, and Pasteurella langaa. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 35, 309-322.
  17. Nascimento, B., Garrido Gomes, A., Nunes Coelho, C., Guisado, M., & Bindean, R. D. (2021). Septic Arthritis and Bacteremia Due to Infection by Pasteurella canis. Cureus, 13(11), e19478. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19478
  18. Shivaprasad, H. L., Cortes, P., & Crespo, R. (2006). Otitis interna (labyrinthitis) associated with Salmonella enterica arizonae in turkey poults. Avian Diseases, 50(1), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1637/7379-051205R.1
  19. Souillard, R., Allain, V., Dufay-Lefort, A. C., Rousset, N., Amalraj, A., Spaans, A., Zbikowski, A., Piccirillo, A., Sevilla-Navarro, S., Kovács, L., & Le Bouquin, S. (2024). Biosecurity implementation on large-scale poultry farms in Europe: A qualitative interview study with farmers. Preventive veterinary medicine, 224, 106119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106119
  20. Wilson, B. A., & Ho, M. (2013). Pasteurella multocida: from zoonosis to cellular microbiology. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 26(3), 631–655. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00024-13

Make a Submission

Journal Metrics (2023) & Ranking

Impact Factor
0.5 (2024)
5 years Impact Factor
0.8
JCR Quartile
Q4
JIF Rank
134/170 (Veterinary Sciences)
SJR (2024)
0.244
SNIP (2024)
0.35

 


 

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Indexed in




Publisher

Keywords