Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Original article
Austral J. Vet. Sci.
Vol 55, 35-60 (2023)
DOI: 10.4067/S0719-81322023000100035

From Domination to Dialogue and the Ethics of the Between:Transforming Human-Working Equine Relationships in Mountain Tourism

1 Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. EH25 9RG.
Keywords: human-equine relationship Domination Dialogue Partnering Martin Buber Awareness-based Action Research Working equine welfare

Submitted: 2022-06-29

Accepted: 2022-11-10

Published: 2023-01-04

*Corresponding author:
glen.cousquer@ed.ac.uk

How to Cite

Cousquer, G. (2023). From Domination to Dialogue and the Ethics of the Between:Transforming Human-Working Equine Relationships in Mountain Tourism. Austral Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 55(1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-81322023000100035

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Glen Cousquer

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The welfare of working equines is born of the relationship co-created with humans and the relational practices humans bring to this work. Our understanding of this relationship remains elusive, however, for it involves attending to that which arises both within and between the equine and the human. Attempts to study such relationships have, arguably, been confounded by the liminalities of relational practices, power literacy and the limitations of language, propositional knowing and the dualistic thinking that characterises many scientific disciplines. This paper presents the theoretical framework that underpins an experiential awareness-based Action Research approach to transforming human-equine relations within the international mountain tourism industry. This approach privileges curiosity, compassion and primary or contemplative knowing and the development of self-awareness. Drawing on the work of Martin Buber on genuine dialogue and of Otto Scharmer on generative dialogue, this paper provides insights into what can arise in the between when attitudinal shifts are encouraged and facilitated that allow humans and equines to meet genuinely and be fully present to each other. This ultimately involves surrendering control, letting go, the dissolution of subject-object awareness and access to non-dualistic ways of knowing. An awareness of the importance of such shifts and of the source from which we operate is of fundamental importance to the realisation of the co-creative project that humans and equines can engage in. Failure to appreciate this distinction, arguably, leads and gives rise to relationships, whether human-to-human or human-to-horse, characterised by domination rather than partnering, absencing rather than presencing, by monologue rather than dialogue. The ethical and practical implications of this awareness are profound, with implications felt at the level of the individual, for whom the I deepens the more you pay attention, and at the level of the relationship, but also at the level of communities, whether these be constituted locally, nationally, internationally or indeed globally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abd El Kader, E. & Daumas, E. (1851/2008). Dialogues sur l’hippologie arabe. Paris: Actes Sud.
  2. Argent, G. (2022). Can you hear me (yet)? – Rhetorical horses, trans-species communication and interpersonal attunement. In: G. Argent and J. Vaught (Eds.). The relational horse: How frameworks of communication, care, politics and power reveal and conceal equine selves (pp.34-50). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
  3. Arts, J., Baldini, A., Goodman, M., Hayashi, A., Jandernoa, B., & Scharmer, O. (2021). Exploring the origins of practice: In dialogue with founding faculty of the Presencing Institute. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 1 (1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v1i1.675
  4. Bachelard, G. (1972). The poetics of reverie. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press.
  5. Bachelard, G. (1969). The poetics of space. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press.
  6. Baquero O. S. (2021). One Health of peripheries: Biopolitics, social determination, and field of praxis. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 617003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.617003
  7. Baquero, O. S., Benavidez Fernández, M. N., & Acero Aguilar, M. (2021). From modern Planetary Health to decolonial promotion of One Health of peripheries. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 637897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.637897
  8. Baratay. E. (2003). Et l’homme créa l’animal: Histoire d’une condition. Paris: Odile-Jacob.
  9. Bendrey, R. (2012). From wild horses to domestic horses: A European perspective. World Archaeology 44 (1) 135-137.
  10. Bendrey, R. (2011). Identification of metal residues associated with bit-use on prehistoric horse teeth by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 38 2989–2994.
  11. Bendrey, R. (2007a). Work- and age-related changes in an Iron Age horse skeleton from Danebury hillfort, Hampshire. Archaeofauna 16 97-108.
  12. Bendrey, R. (2007b). New methods for the identification of evidence for bitting on horse remains from archaeological sites. Journal of Archaeological Science 34 1036-1050.
  13. Bendrey, R. (2011). Identification of metal residues associated with bit-use on prehistoric horse teeth by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 38 2989–2994.
  14. Bendrey, R. (2012). From wild horses to domestic horses: A European perspective. World Archaeology 44 (1) 135-137.
  15. Berger, J. (2009). Why look at animals? London: Penguin.
  16. Bieri, B. H. (2008). The sympathetic imagination and the human—animal bond: Fostering empathy through reading imaginative literature. Anthrozoös 21 (3), 213-220.
  17. Birke, L. (2007). Learning to speak horse: The culture of natural horsemanship. Society and Animals, 15, 217-239.
  18. Birke, L. & Brandt. K. (2009). Mutual corporeality: Gender and human/horse relationships. Women’s Studies International Forum 32, 189-197.
  19. Bortoft, H. (2012). Taking appearance seriously. The dynamic way of seeing in Goethe and European thought. Edinburgh: Floris.
  20. Brown, B. (2015). Rising strong. London: Ebury Publishing.
  21. Buber, M. (2000). I and thou. New York: Scribner.
  22. Buffon, G. L. (1791). Buffon’s natural history. London: Kearsley.
  23. Buller, H. (2013). Individuation, the mass and farm animals. Theory, Culture and Society, 30 (7/9). 155-175.
  24. Buller, H. (2015). Animal geographies II: Methods. Progress in Human Geography, 39 (3), 374-384. doi: 10.1177/0309132514527401
  25. Buller, H. (2013). Individuation, the mass and farm animals. Theory, Culture and Society, 30 (7/9). 155-175.
  26. Cochrane, E. (2017). My Gaia, my guide. Horsemanship, 102, 44-45.
  27. Cochrane, E. (2015a). Mule training report. Kasbah du Toubkal, Imlil. January, 2015.
  28. Cochrane, E. (2015b). Mule and muleteer training report. Kasbah du Toubkal, Imlil. February-March, 2015.
  29. Cochrane, E. (2017). My Gaia, my guide. Horsemanship, 102, 44-45.
  30. Cook, R.W. (2013). A method for measuring bit-induced pain and distress in the ridden horse. 9th International Equitation Science Conference, July 2013, USA.
  31. Cook, R.W. (1999). Pathophysiology of bit control in the horse. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 19 (3), 196-204.
  32. Cook, W.R. &and Kibler, M. (2018). Behavioural assessment of pain in 66 horses, with and without a bit. Equine Veterinary Education. doi: 10.1111/eve.12916
  33. Cousquer, G.O. (2018). Knowing the mule: Faring well in Moroccan mountain tourism. PhD thesis: University of Edinburgh.
  34. Cousquer, G.O. & Alison, P. (2012). The Mountain Guide’s and expedition leader’s ethical responsibilities to pack animals on expedition. Annals of Tourism Research. 39 (4), 1839-1858.
  35. Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (1981). Tales of horsemen. Edinburgh: Canongate.
  36. De Fontenay, E. & Pasquier, M.C. (2008). Traduire le parler des bêtes. Paris: Éditions de L’Herne.
  37. DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and society: An introduction to human-animal studies. New York: Columbia University Press
  38. Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I am. New York: Fordham University Press.
  39. Despret, V. (2009). Comprendre l'homme à partir de l’animal ? Pouvoirs 4 (131), 5-17. doi: 10.3917/pouv.131.0005
  40. Donovan, J. (2008). Feminism and the treatment of animals: From care to dialogue. In: S.J. Armstrong and R.G. Botzler (Eds.). The animal ethics reader. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  41. Eisler, R. & Fry,. D.P. (2019). Nurturing our humanity: How domination and partnership shape our brains, lives and futures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  42. Enoff, P. (2014). Le silence des chevaux: Plaidoyer pour une autre monde équestre. Paris: Amphora.
  43. Esterson, E. (2014). The ultimate book of horse bits. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.
  44. Fennell, D.A. (2012a). Tourism and animal ethics. London: Routledge.
  45. Fennell, D.A. (2012b). Tourism, animals and utilitarianism. Tourism Recreation Research, 37 (3), 239-249.
  46. Foley, S. (2007). Getting to yes: Clicker training for improved horsemanship. Neptune City, NJ: T.F.H. Publications.
  47. Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education. Westport, CT, USA: Bergin and Garvey.
  48. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Thirtieth anniversary edition. London: Continuum.
  49. Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilisation. London: Sage.
  50. Game, A. (2001). Riding: Embodying the centaur. Body & Society, 7 (4), 1-12.
  51. Goldstein, (2004). War and gender. In: C.R. Ember and M. Ember (Eds.). Encyclopaedia of sex and gender (pp. 107-116). Springer US.
  52. Grandin, T. (2008). Thinking like animals. In: S.J. Armstrong and R.G. Botzler (Eds.). The animal ethics reader. Second edition. pp. 225-227. London: Routledge.
  53. Grandin, T. & Johnson, C. (2009). Animals make us human: Creating the best life for animals. Orlando, FL: Houghton-Mifflin Harcourt.
  54. Gruen, L. (2011). Ethics and animals: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  55. Hall, S. J. G. (2005). The horse in human society. In: D. Mills and S. McDonnell (Eds.). The domestic horse: The evolution, development and management of its behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  56. Hall, C., Goodwin, D., Heleski, C., Randle, H. & Waran, N. (2008). Is there evidence of learned helplessness in horses? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 11 (3), 249-266.
  57. Hallberg, L. (2008). Walking the way of the horse. Exploring the power of the horse-human relationship. New York: I Universe Books.
  58. Hanh, T. N. (2021). Zen and the art of saving the planet. London: Penguin.
  59. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
  60. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
  61. Harding, S. (2013). Animate Earth: Science, intuition and Gaia. Cambridge: Green Books.
  62. Heron, J. & Reason, P. (2008). Extending epistemology within a co-operative inquiry. In: P. Reason and H. Bradbury (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. pp. 366-380. London: SAGE Publications.
  63. Hinchliffe, S. (2005). Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (5), 643-658.
  64. Hübl Hübl, T. (2020). Healing collective trauma: A process for healing our cultural and intergenerational wounds. Boulder, Colorado: Sounds True.
  65. Karrasch, S., Karrasch, V. & Newman, A. (2000). You can train your horse to do anything!: On target training. Clicker training and beyond. Otley, UK: Chevin Books.
  66. Koenig, O., Pomeroy, E., Seneque, M., & Scharmer, O. (2021). Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change: Moving from transactional to relational. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 1 (2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v1i2.1972
  67. Kramer , (2003). Martin Buber’s I and Thou: Practicing living dialogue. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press.
  68. Kurland, A. (2007). Clicker training for your horse. Waltham, MA: Sunshine Books
  69. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
  70. Levine, M.A. (1999). Botai and the origins of horse domestication. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 18, 29–78.
  71. Levine, M.A. (2005). Domestication and early history of the horse. In: D. Mills and S. McDonnell (Eds.). The domestic horse: The evolution, development and management of its behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  72. Levine, M.A. (1999). Botai and the origins of horse domestication. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 18, 29–78.
  73. Macy, J. & Brown, M. (2014). Coming back to life. Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New society Publication.
  74. Markwell, K. (2015). Animals and tourism: Understanding diverse relationships. Bristol: Channel View Publications,
  75. McLean, A. N. & McGreevy, P. D. (2010). Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behaviour, 5, 187-195
  76. McManus, A. (2014). Makers of fire: The spirituality of leading from the future. IMN Idea Lab.
  77. McVey, R.J. (2017). Responsible doubt and embodied conviction: The infrastructure of British equestrian horse/human “partnership.” Cambridge Anthropology, 35 (2), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.3167/cja.2017.350208
  78. Merrifield, A. (2008). The wisdom of donkeys. London: Short Books.
  79. Mitchell, P. (2015). Horse nations: The worldwide impact of the horse on indigenous societies post 1492. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  80. Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. London: Duke University Press.
  81. Morgan, M.H. (1962). The art of horsemanship by Xenophon. London: J.A. Allen.
  82. Murphy, P. (1991). Prolegomenon for an ecofeminist dialogics. In: D. M. Bauer and S.J. McKinstry (Eds.). Feminism, bakhtin and the dialogic. pp. 39-56. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  83. O’Donohue, J. (2008). To bless the space between us: A book of blessings. London: Convergent Books.
  84. Pignon, F., Delgado, M. & Walser, D. (2009). Gallop to freedom: Training horses with the founding stars of Cavalia. North Pomfret, Vermont: Trafalgar Press.
  85. Pomeroy, E., Herman, L., Jung, S., Laenens, E., Pastorini, L. & Ruiter,A. (2021). Exploring Action Research from the social field. Journal of Awareness Based Systems Change 1(1), 105-117.
  86. Scharmer, O. (2016). Theory U. Leading from the future as it emerges. The social technology of presencing. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  87. Senge, P., Smith, B., Kruschwitz, N., Lauer, J. & Schley, S. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. New York, Doubleday.
  88. Smith, S. J. (2011). Becoming horse in the duration of the moment: The trainer’s challenge. Phenomenology & Practice, 5 (1), 7-26.
  89. Snyder, G. (1990). The practice of the wild. Berkeley, California: Counterpoint.
  90. Thesiger, W. (2007). Arabian sands. London: Penguin Classics.
  91. Van Weeren, R. (2017). Horses and humans: A special bond throughout the ages. Argos, 56, 205-211.
  92. Vignes, J.D. (2011). The origins of animal domestication and husbandry: A major change in the history of humanity and the biosphere. Comptes Rendue Biologies 334, 171-181.
  93. Waran, N. & Randle, H. (2017). What we can measure, we can manage: The importance of using robust welfare indicators in equitation science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 190, 74–81.
  94. Waran, N., McGreevy, P. & Casey, R. A. (2002). Training methods and horse welfare. In: N. Waran (Ed.). The welfare of horses (pp. 151–180). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
  95. Warren-Smith, A. K., & McGreevy, P. D. (2007). The use of blended positive and negative reinforcement in shaping the halt response of horses. Animal Welfare, 16, 481–488
  96. Wemelsfelder, F. (2012). A science of friendly pigs. In: L. Birke and J. Hockenhall (Eds.). Crossing boundaries: Investigating human-animal relationships. Leiden: Brill.
  97. Whyte, D. (2015). Consolations: The solace, nourishment and underlying meaning of everyday words. Langley, Washington: Many Rivers Press.
  98. Whyte, D. & Tippett, K. (2016 ). The conversational nature of reality. [Audio podcast] On Being Studios. https://onbeing.org/programs/david-whyte-the-conversational-nature-of-reality/
  99. Wink, W. (1992). Engaging the powers: Discernment and resistance in a world of domination. New York: Galilee Doubleday.
  100. Wink, W. (1999). The powers that be: Theology for a new millennium. New York: Galilee Doubleday.

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Journal Metrics (2023) & Ranking

Impact Factor
→
0.5 (2024)
5 years Impact Factor
→
0.8
JCR Quartile
→
Q4
JIF Rank
→
134/170 (Veterinary Sciences)
SJR (2024)
→
0.244
SNIP (2024)
→
0.35

 

 

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Indexed in

Publisher


This journal is published by the Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile

Keywords