Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Short communication
Austral J. Vet. Sci.
Vol 49, 191-194 (2017)

Antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus associated with subclinical and clinical mastitis in Uruguay during an eight-year period

1 Departments of Dairy Science and Technology and Biostatistics and Informatics of Veterinary Faculty, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
2 Department of Microbiology, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Montevideo, Uruguay.
3 Cooperativa COLAVECO, Nueva Helvecia, Colonia, Uruguay.
4 National Institute of Agricultural Research La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus mastitis antibiotics Uruguay

Submitted: 2016-01-24

Accepted: 2017-06-30

Published: 2017-09-01

*Corresponding author:
rosario.rdelos@gmail.com

How to Cite

de los Santos, R. I., Zunino, P. M., Gil, A. D., Laport, A., & Hirigoyen, D. J. (2017). Antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus associated with subclinical and clinical mastitis in Uruguay during an eight-year period. Austral Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 49(3), 191–194. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-81322017000300191

Abstract

Records of in vitro susceptibility tests performed between 2008 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed in order to evaluate the dynamic profiles of possible changes in antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk samples of cows with subclinical mastitis from 12 different Uruguayan Provinces. The results of 1,631 isolates tested by disk diffusion technique
for susceptibility to penicillin and erythromycin were analysed. The possible tendency or changes in the behaviour of this pathogen against penicillin and erythromycin in the 8 year period was evaluated using the chi-square tests for trend and the homogeneity. The highest rate of resistance was observed for penicillin (36.9% in 2010), while erythromycin showed a resistance rate significantly lower (5.7% in 2015). The test for trend showed a significant trend towards decreased resistance to penicillin, whereas for erythromycin an increased resistance trend was observed. The determination of the scope of the problem is essential for the formulation and monitoring of effective response to anti-microbial resistance (AMR). Antibiotic assessment in Uruguay is now being reviewed with the objective of limiting antibiotics prescription to professionals trained to select a successful therapy, choosing the appropriated drug and treatment duration according each situation. To generate knowledge on the magnitude and tendency of the AMR problem using country-specific information must be a priority.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Barkema H, Green M, Bradley A, Zadoks R. 2009. Invited review: The role of contagious disease in udder health. J Dairy Sci 92, 4717- 4729; doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2347.
  2. Barlow J. 2011. Mastitis therapy and antimicrobial susceptibility: A multispecies review with a focus on antibiotic treatment of mastitis in dairy cattle.
  3. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 16, 383-407. DOI:10.1007/s10911-011-9235-z. Bauer A, Kirby W, Sherris J, Turck M. 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Amer J Clin Pathol 45, 493-496.
  4. Brady R, O’May G, Leid J, Prior M, Costerton J, et al. 2011. Resolution of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection using vaccination and antibiotic treatment. Infect Immun 79, 1797-803. DOI: 10.1128/ IAI.00451-10.
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2011. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-First Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, USA.
  6. de los Santos R, Fernández M, Carro S, Zunino P. 2014. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from cases of bovine subclinical mastitis in two Uruguayan dairy farms. Arch Med Vet 46, 315-30120.
  7. Dias RS, Eller MR, Duarte VS, Pereira ÂL, Silva CC, et al. 2013. Use of phages against antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. J Anim Sci 91, 3930-3939. DOI: 10.2527/ jas.2012-5884.
  8. Erskine RJ, Walker R, Bolin C, Bartlett P, White D. 2002. Trends in antibacterial susceptibility of mastitis pathogens during a seven-year period. J Dairy Sci 85, 1111-1118.
  9. Giannecchini R, Concha C, Delucci I, Gil J, Salvarrey L, et al. 2014. Mastitis bovina, reconocimiento de los patógenos y su resistencia antimicrobiana en la Cuenca Lechera del Sur de Uruguay. Veterinaria, Montevideo 50, 4-32.
  10. Hiramatsu K, Cui L, Kuroda M, Ito T. 2001. The emergence and evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol 9, 486-493. DOI: 10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02175-8.
  11. Hoet A, D’Pool G, Fulcado W, Polo R, Graterol C, et al. 1999. Aislamiento de estafilococos coagulasa positivos, distintos a Staphylococcus aureus, de cuartos con mastitis subclínica en la Villa del Rosario, Estado Zulia, Venezuela. Rev Científica FCV-LUZ IX, 149-153.
  12. Jagielski T, Puacz E, Lisowski A, Siedlecki P, Dudziak W, et al. 2014. Short communication: Antimicrobial susceptibility profiling and genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis in Poland. J Dairy Sci 97, 6122-6128.
  13. Kateete D, Kimani C, Katabazi F, Okeng A, Okee M, et al. 2010. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus: DNase and mannitol salt agar improve the efficiency of the tube coagulase test.; Ann Clin Microb Anti 9, 23. DOI:10.1186/1476-0711-9-23.
  14. Kenar B, Kuyucuo lu Y, eker E. 2012. Antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis in Turkey. Pak Vet J 32, 390-393.
  15. Makovec JA, Ruegg PL. 2003; Antimicrobial resistance of bacteria isolated from dairy cow milk samples submitted for bacterial culture: 8,905 samples (1994-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 222, 1582-1589.
  16. Myllys V, Asplund K, Brofeldt E, Hirvela- Koski V, Honkamen-Buzalski T, et al. 1998. Bovine mastitis in Finland in 1998 and 1995 - changes in prevalence and antimicrobial resistance. Acta Vet Scand 39, 119-126.
  17. National Mastitis Council. 1999. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Revised ed. Natl Mastitis Counc, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin USA.
  18. Pikälä A, Haveri M, Pyörälä S, Myllys V, Honkanen-Buzalski T. 2004. Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001-Prevalence, distribution of bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance. J Dairy Sci 87, 2433-2441.
  19. Pol M, Ruegg P. 2007. Treatment practices and quantification of antimicrobial usage. J Dairy Sci 90, 249-261.
  20. Ruegg P, Oliveira L, Jin W, Okwumabua O. 2015. Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility and occurrence of selected resistance genes in gram-positive mastitis pathogens isolated from Wisconsin dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 98, 4521-4534.
  21. San Martín B, Kruze J, Morales MA, Agüero H, León B, et al. 2002. Bacterial resistance of mastitis pathogens isolated from dairy cows in the Vth Region, Metropolitan Region and Xth Region, Chile. Arch Med Vet 34, 221-234.
  22. Treangen T, Maybank R, Enke S, Friss M, Diviak L, et al. 2014. Complete Genome Sequence of the Quality Control Strain Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus ATCC 25923. Genome Announc 2:e01110-14.; DOI:10.1128/genomeA.01110-14.

Make a Submission

Journal Metrics (2023) & Ranking

Impact Factor
0.5 (2024)
5 years Impact Factor
0.8
JCR Quartile
Q4
JIF Rank
134/170 (Veterinary Sciences)
SJR (2024)
0.244
SNIP (2024)
0.35

 


 

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Indexed in




Publisher

Keywords