Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Short communication
Austral J. Vet. Sci.
Vol 50, 51-54 (2018)

Comparison of common tests performance for Mycobacterium bovis infection diagnosis in low prevalence dairy cattle herds of southern Chile

1 Instituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile; Escuela de Graduados, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
2 Instituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Keywords: bovine tuberculosis prevalence diagnose

Submitted: 2017-05-30

Accepted: 2017-11-08

Published: 2018-01-01

How to Cite

Raffo, E., Monti, G., & Salgado, M. (2018). Comparison of common tests performance for Mycobacterium bovis infection diagnosis in low prevalence dairy cattle herds of southern Chile. Austral Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 50(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-81322018000100109

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the performance of routinely used diagnostic tests to detect M. bovis infection in cattle populations with very low infection prevalence. A cross-sectional study was performed using 609 animals from 17 herds that were sampled for blood interferon, and tested with the caudal fold tuberculin test (CFT). It was planned that animals which showed CFT positive results were sent to the slaughterhouse for post mortem confirmation testing. However, not all the animals considered in the initial sampling were culled. Paired population proportions of positive results for the different diagnostic tools were compared. Apparent sensitivity and specificity was also estimated. Overall, intradermal tuberculin based diagnostics showed better performance in comparison to interferon based test, even though interferon was slightly more specific. From these results, it may be suggested that specific cut-off lines for interferon based techniques for certain areas with particular low bTB prevalence should be considered, as well as the modification of more specific antigens and the use of better combinations of PPDs if in vitro testing is intended must be taken into consideration. The uncertain role of interference bacteria that could be affecting the results of the in vitro analysis must be considered, and perhaps this could explain the apparent lack of consensus of the results obtained in Chile versus the ones obtained elsewhere. More studies must be performed in order to assess this issue.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Álvarez J, Pérez A,Bezos J, Marqués S, Grau A, et al. 2012. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of bovine tuberculosis diagnostic tests in naturally infected cattle herds using a Bayesian approach. Vet Microbiol 155, 38-43.
  2. Antognoli MC, Remmenga MD, Bengtson SD, Clark HJ, Orloski KA, et al. 2011. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the gamma interferon assay for detection of bovine tuberculosis in U.S. herds. Prev Vet Med 101, 35-41.
  3. Bezos J, Álvarez J, Romero B, de Juan L, Dominguez L. 2014a . Bovine tuberculosis: historical perspective. Res Vet Sci 97, S3-4.
  4. Bezos J, Casal C, Romero B, Schroeder B, Hardegger R, et al. 2014b. Current ante-mortem techniques for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Res Vet Sci 97, 44-52.
  5. de la Rua-Domenech R, Goodchild AT, Vordermeier HM, Hewinson RG, Christiansen KH, et al. 2006. Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle: A review of the tuberculin tests, gamma-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques. Res Vet Sci 81, 190-210.
  6. Faye S, Moyen JL, Gares H, Benet JJ, Garin-Bastuji B, et al. 2011. Determination of decisional cut-off values for the optimal diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis with a modified IFNgamma assay (Bovigam(R)) in a low prevalence area in France. Vet Microbiol 151, 60-67.
  7. Gormley E, Doyle M, Duignan A, Good M, More SJ, et al. 2013. Identification of risk factors associated with disclosure of false positive bovine tuberculosis reactors using the gamma-interferon (IFN gamma) assay. Vet Res 44.
  8. Kruze J, Monti G, Schulze F, Mella A, Leiva S. 2013. Herd-level prevalence of Map infection in dairy herds of southern Chile determined by culture of environmental fecal samples and bulk-tank milk qPCR. Prev Vet Med 111, 319-324.
  9. Lopes LB, Alves TM, Stynen APR, Mota PMPC, Leite RC, et al. 2012. Parameter estimation and use of gamma interferon assay for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in Brazil. Pesqui Vet Bras 32, 279-283.
  10. Max V, Paredes L, Rivera A, Ternicier C. 2011. National control and eradication program of bovine tuberculosis in Chile. Vet Microbiol 151, 188-191.
  11. Neill SD, Skuce RA, Pollock JM. 2005. Tuberculosis-new light from an old window. J Appl Microbiol 98, 1261-1269.
  12. Schiller I, Vordermeier HM, Waters WR, Kyburz A, Cagiola M, et al. 2010. Comparison of tuberculin activity using the interferon-gamma assay for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Vet Rec 167, 322-326.
  13. Schiller I, Waters WR, Vordermeier HM, Jemmi T, Welsh M, et al. 2011. Bovine tuberculosis in Europe from the perspective of an officially tuberculosis free country: trade, surveillance and diagnostics. Vet Microbiol 151, 153-159.
  14. van Soolingen D, Borgdorff MW, de Haas PE, Sebek MM, Veen J, Dessens M, et al. 1999. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in the Netherlands: a nationwide study from 1993 through 1997. J Infect Dis 180, 726-736.

Make a Submission

Journal Metrics (2023) & Ranking

Impact Factor
0.5 (2024)
5 years Impact Factor
0.8
JCR Quartile
Q4
JIF Rank
134/170 (Veterinary Sciences)
SJR (2024)
0.244
SNIP (2024)
0.35

 


 

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Indexed in




Publisher

Keywords