Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Short communication
Austral J. Vet. Sci.
Vol 58, e580101 (2026)

Comparison of clinical and paraclinical effects of intraosseous propofol versus inhalational isoflurane anesthesia in rabbits

1 Department of Veterinary Medicine, ShK.C., Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran.
Keywords: Biochemistry Hematology Pharmacodynamics pharmacokinetics

Submitted: 2025-09-19

Accepted: 2025-12-01

Published: 2026-01-27

*Corresponding author:
mehdifareed@yahoo.com

How to Cite

Motamedi, A., Farid, M., & Saghaei, F. (2026). Comparison of clinical and paraclinical effects of intraosseous propofol versus inhalational isoflurane anesthesia in rabbits. Austral Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 58(1), e580101. https://doi.org/10.4206/ajvs.58.1

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the clinical and paraclinical effects of inhalational isoflurane anesthesia with intraosseous propofol anesthesia in rabbits. Twelve healthy white rabbits (2 kg, 12 months old) were randomly allocated to two groups (n = 6). Group 1 received intraosseous propofol, and Group 2 underwent induction and maintenance with isoflurane for 30 min. Heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, and oxygen saturation were recorded every 5 min during anesthesia. Hematological and serum biochemical parameters were evaluated pre-and post-anesthesia. Hematological parameters and biochemical indices were measured in each group pre- and post-anesthesia, and changes in these variables were compared between the two groups. Heart rate remained comparable between the groups, except at 5, 10, and 25 min post-induction. The respiratory rate differed significantly between the groups throughout the duration of anesthesia in both groups (P < 0.05). Hematocrit, hemoglobin, and red and white blood cell counts decreased post-anesthesia, with greater reductions in hematocrit and hemoglobin in the isoflurane group (P < 0.05). Serum activities of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) significantly declined in both groups (P < 0.05). Intraosseous propofol provided rapid induction, stable cardiopulmonary parameters, and acceptable biochemical safety, whereas isoflurane offered superior oxygenation. These findings suggest that intraosseous propofol administration is a practical alternative when venous catheterization or airway intubation is difficult, especially in emergency situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bersanetti, G., & Martorelli, M. (2021). Anesthesia in rabbits. Veterinaria, 35(5), 221-230.
  2. Brodbelt, D. (2009). Perioperative mortality in small animal anesthesia. Veterinary Journal, 182, 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.06.011
  3. Daneshi, M. (2007). Clinical comparison between intraosseous and in¬travenous anesthesia by a combination of ketamine – xylazine in dog [Farsi]. Journal of clinical research of large animals 1, 7-11.
  4. Flecknell, P. (2015). Laboratory animal anesthesia (4th ed.). Elsevier. https:// doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-13494-0
  5. Fusco, A., Douglas, H., Barba, A., Hopster, K., Stefanovski, D., Sinder, B., Cahill, P. J., Snyder, B., & Schaer, T. P. (2021) V-Gel Guided Endotra¬cheal Intubation in Rabbits. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.684624
  6. Kennedy, C.R., Gladden, J.N., & Rozanski, E.A. (2020). Comparison of 3 intraosseous catheter sites and methods of determining placement success in cadaver rabbits. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, 84(1), 33-36. PMCID: PMC6921990
  7. Lamont, L., Grimm K., Robertson, S., Love, L., & Schroeder, C. (eds.) (2024). Veterinary anesthesia and analgesia, the 6th edition of Lumb and Jones. Wiley-Blackwell.
  8. Marjani, M., & Mehrvar, A. (2012). Comparison of intravenous and in¬traosseous anesthesia in animal models [Farsi]. Journal of Iranian society of anesthesiology and intensive care, 34, 51-57.
  9. Mazaheri-Khameneh, R., Sarrafzadeh, F., & Asri-Rezaei, S. (2012). Evalua¬tion of clinical and paraclinical effects of intraosseous vs intravenous administration of propofol on general anesthesia in rabbits. Veterinary Research Forum, 3, 103-109. PMCID: PMC4312804
  10. Miller, R. D. (2015) Miller’s anesthesia. Elsevier.
  11. Sarrafzadeh-Rezaei, F., Dalir-Naghadeh, B., & Hassanpour, H. (2008). Induction of general anesthesia with intraoseous injection of thiopental in rabbits. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 24, 227-232. https:// doi.org/10.22099/ijvr.2008.569
  12. Wenger, S. (2012). Anesthesia and Analgesia in Rabbits and Rodents. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, 21(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1053/j. jepm.2011.11.010

Make a Submission

Journal Metrics (2023) & Ranking

Impact Factor
0.5 (2024)
5 years Impact Factor
0.8
JCR Quartile
Q4
JIF Rank
134/170 (Veterinary Sciences)
SJR (2024)
0.244
SNIP (2024)
0.35

 


 

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Indexed in




Publisher

Keywords