Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Short communication
Austral J. Vet. Sci.
Vol 57, e5711 (2025)
DOI: 10.4206/ajvs.57.11

Objective structured assessment of veterinary students' suture skills before and after training in theory and practice

1 Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
2 Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Keywords: OSATS Veterinary surgical skills simple suture verification of competences hands-on learning

Submitted: 2024-11-21

Accepted: 2025-05-13

Published: 2025-06-01

*Corresponding author:
iarias@uchile.cl

How to Cite

Rodríguez, M. P., Marinkovic, B., Ale, N., Santis, P., & Arias, J. I. (2025). Objective structured assessment of veterinary students’ suture skills before and after training in theory and practice. Austral Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 57(1), e5711. https://doi.org/10.4206/ajvs.57.11

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Paz Rodríguez, Boris Marinkovic, Nicolas Ale, Paulina Santis, Jose Ignacio Arias

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) in measuring and improving veterinary students’ proficiency in simple suturing. Forty final-year veterinary students participated in a structured training session that included theoretical instruction, video demonstrations, and hands-on practice sessions. Performance was assessed pre- and post-training using the OSATS, incorporating both a global rating scale and a procedural checklist. Before training, only 50% of the students met the passing criteria, with common deficiencies in needle handling, suture placement, and wound-edge eversion. After the intervention, the pass rate increased to 90%, with significant improvements across most performance indicators (P < 0.05), although deficiencies in movement fluidity persisted. Gender analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the overall performance. These findings confirm that OSATS is a valid and reliable tool for objectively assessing technical surgical skills in veterinary education. This study supports its integration into veterinary curricula to standardize competency evaluation and enhance training outcomes. Future research should explore its application in diverse surgical procedures and assess long-term skill retention through follow-up assessments. The results offer practical guidance for veterinary educators aiming to develop structured, skill-based learning environments that ensure clinical readiness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Anastakis, D. J., Wanzel, K. R., Brown, M. H., McIlroy, J. H., Hamstra, S. J., Ali, J., Hutchison, C. R., Murnaghan, J., Reznick, R. K., & Regehr, G. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of a 2-year curriculum in a surgical skills center. American Journal of Surgery, 185(4), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01403-4
  2. Chen, H., & Lindeman, B. 2024. Illustrative Handbook of General Surgery. Springer Nature, Switzerland.
  3. Chen, C. Y., Ragle, C. A., Lencioni, R., & Fransson, B. A. (2017). Comparison of 2 training programs for basic laparoscopic skills and simulated surgery performance in veterinary students. Veterinary Surgery, 46(8), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12729
  4. Darzi, A., & Mackay, S. (2001). Assessment of surgical competence. Quality in Health Care, 10(Suppl 2), ii64–ii69. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.0100064
  5. Farrell, R. M., Gilbert, G. E., Betance, L., Huck, J., Hunt, J. A., Dundas, J., & Pope, E. (2022). Evaluating validity evidence for 2 instruments developed to assess students' surgical skills in a simulated environment. Veterinary Surgery, 51(5), 788–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13799v
  6. Fecso, A. B., Szasz, P., Kerezov, G., & Grantcharov, T. P. (2017). The effect of technical performance on patient outcomes in surgery: A systematic review. Annals of Surgery, 265(3), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001971
  7. Fransson, B. A., Ragle, C. A., & Bryan, M. E. (2012). Effects of two training curricula on basic laparoscopic skills and surgical performance among veterinarians. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 241(4), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.241.4.451
  8. Hincapié-Gutiérrez, L. C., Oviedo-Peñata, C. A., Rojas-Galvis, M. A., Riaño-Benavides, C. H., & Maldonado-Estrada, J. G. (2023). Implementation of a canine ergonomic abdominal simulator for training basic laparoscopic skills in veterinarians. Animals, 13(24), 3781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13243781
  9. Hopmans, C. J., den Hoed, P. T., van der Laan, L., van der Harst, E., van der Elst, M., Mannaerts, G. H., Dawson, I., Timman, R., Wijnhoven, B. P., & IJzermans, J. N. (2014). Assessment of surgery residents' operative skills in the operating theater using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS): A prospective multicenter study. Surgery, 156(5), 1078–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.018
  10. Hoyt, B. W., Clark, D. M., Lundy, A. E., Schroeder, N. S., Wagner, S. C., & Langhammer, C. (2022). Validation of a high-fidelity fracture fixation model for skill acquisition in orthopedic surgery residents. Journal of Surgical Education, 79(6), 1282–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.010
  11. Huang, Z. N., He, Q. C., Qiu, W. W., Wu, J., Zheng, C. Y., Lin, G. S., Li, P., Wang, J. B., Lin, J. X., Lu, J., Cao, L. L., Lin, M., Tu, R. H., Zheng, C. H., Chen, Q. Y., Huang, C. M., & Xie, J. W. (2024). OSATS scoring confirms ICG enhancement of performance in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: A post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Surgery, 110, 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2023.10.012
  12. Kiely, D. J., Gotlieb, W. H., Jardon, K., Lau, S., & Press, J. Z. (2015). Advancing surgical simulation in gynecologic oncology: Robotic dissection of a novel pelvic lymphadenectomy model. Simulation in Healthcare, 10(1), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000065
  13. Kuzminsky, J., Phillips, H., Sharif, H., Moran, C., Gleason, H. E., Topulos, S. P., Pitt, K., McNeil, L. K., McCoy, A. M., & Kesavadas, T. (2023). Reliability in performance assessment creates a potential application of artificial intelligence in veterinary education: Evaluation of suturing skills at a single institution. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 84(8). https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.03.0087
  14. Langebæk, R., Tanggaard, L., Toft, N., & Berendt, M. (2020). Using creativity as an educational tool in veterinary surgery: Students' perceptions and surgical performance. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0218-023r
  15. MacArthur, S. L., Johnson, M. D., & Colee, J. C. (2021). Effect of a spay simulator on student competence and anxiety. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 48(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.2019-0075
  16. Martin, J. A., Regehr, G., Reznick, R., MacRae, H., Murnaghan, J., Hutchison, C., & Brown, M. (1997). Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. British Journal of Surgery, 84(2), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800840237
  17. Niveditha, M., Sharma, R., & Suri, A. (2022). Microsurgical suturing assessment scores: A systematic review. Neurosurgical Review, 45(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01569-3
  18. Sanfey, H., & Dunnington, G. (2010). Verification of proficiency: A prerequisite for clinical experience. Surgical Clinics of North America, 90(3), 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2010.02.005
  19. Schnabel, L. V., Maza, P. S., Williams, K. M., Irby, N. L., McDaniel, C. M., & Collins, B. G. (2013). Use of a formal assessment instrument for evaluation of veterinary student surgical skills. Veterinary Surgery, 42(4), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12006.x
  20. Sidhu, R. S., Grober, E. D., Musselman, L. J., & Reznick, R. K. (2004). Assessing competency in surgery: Where to begin? Surgery, 135(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(03)00274-7
  21. Sugden, C., & Aggarwal, R. (2010). Assessment and feedback in the skills laboratory and operating room. Surgical Clinics of North America, 90(3), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2010.02.003
  22. Szasz, P., Louridas, M., Harris, K. A., Aggarwal, R., & Grantcharov, T. P. (2015). Assessing technical competence in surgical trainees: A systematic review. Annals of Surgery, 261(6), 1046–1055. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001046
  23. van Hove, P. D., Tuijthof, G. J. M., Verdaasdonk, E. G. G., Stassen, L. P. S., & Dankelman, J. (2010). Objective assessment of technical surgical skills. British Journal of Surgery, 97(7), 972–987. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7115

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Journal Metrics (2023) & Ranking

Impact Factor
→
0.5 (2024)
5 years Impact Factor
→
0.8
JCR Quartile
→
Q4
JIF Rank
→
134/170 (Veterinary Sciences)
SJR (2024)
→
0.244
SNIP (2024)
→
0.35

 

 

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Indexed in

Publisher


This journal is published by the Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile

Keywords